sashram97
09-15 04:23 PM
My husband thinks if he loses his job he would get unemployment and medicaid benefits if we are permanent residents.
Now his job is fine, his insurance is going on good.
But the question is when he loses his job.
Thats why he is worried.
Now his job is fine, his insurance is going on good.
But the question is when he loses his job.
Thats why he is worried.
wallpaper Lady Gaga has become famous
Blog Feeds
01-13 08:30 AM
As we watch the earthquake destruction in Haiti with horror, one group of individuals that will likely start to get attention is the population of Haitians currently in the US and who are obviously not going to be able to safely return home anytime soon. US immigration law actually has a system to handle precisely this situation. It's called Temporary Protected Status and it is available to individuals who are from country suffering armed conflicts, disasters, or other extraordinary conditions. The Secretary of Homeland Security is empowered to determine which countries are on the TPS list. People in TPS status...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/01/haiti-tps-coming.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/01/haiti-tps-coming.html)
Blog Feeds
07-09 12:30 PM
AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:
Senator Sessions cannot leave his hands off of E-Verify. Now in "stealth" mode, Senator Sessions has slyly introduced an E-Verify amendment (SB 1371) during today's full Senate vote on the DHS appropriations bill.
The Sessions amendment calls for a permanent reauthorization of the Basic Pilot/E-Verify program, and mandates its use for all federal contractors and subcontractors - including the verification of all existing employees. This amounts to a massive expansion of a program that is still not ready for prime-time.
We must call our Senators and tell them to oppose this sneak attack by Senator Sessions for the following reasons:
It would impose exorbitant costs on businesses at a time when our economy is most vulnerable:
An economic analysis commissioned by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce
concluded that the net societal costs of the program would be $10 billion a year
� a cost that would be felt disproportionately by small businesses. It would make Basic Pilot/E-Verify permanent without addressing its well documented database inaccuracies:
A 2007 independent evaluation of the program commissioned by DHS found that
the Basic Pilot/E-Verify database �is still not sufficiently up to date� to meet
the requirements for �accurate verification.�
SSA has estimated that if Basic Pilot/E-Verify were to become mandatory and
the databases were not improved, SSA database errors alone could result in 3.6
million workers a year being misidentified as not authorized for employment.
This would result in 6 out of every 100 workers having to visit an SSA office to
correct their records or lose their job.
It would force workers and businesses to pay a high price for Basic Pilot/E-Verify's inaccuracies:
Queries submitted to Basic Pilot/E-Verify by Intel Corporation in 2008 resulted
in nearly 13 percent of all workers being initially flagged as unauthorized for
employment. All of these workers were cleared by Basic Pilot/E-Verify as
work-authorized, but only after �significant investment of time and money�
and �lost productivity.�We urge all AILA members to call their Congressman today and oppose the Sessions amendment (SB 1371). Don't let Senator Session's stealth tactics create a nationwide crisis for employers!
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-5839069238864574507?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/07/there-he-goes-again-sessions-and-e.html)
Senator Sessions cannot leave his hands off of E-Verify. Now in "stealth" mode, Senator Sessions has slyly introduced an E-Verify amendment (SB 1371) during today's full Senate vote on the DHS appropriations bill.
The Sessions amendment calls for a permanent reauthorization of the Basic Pilot/E-Verify program, and mandates its use for all federal contractors and subcontractors - including the verification of all existing employees. This amounts to a massive expansion of a program that is still not ready for prime-time.
We must call our Senators and tell them to oppose this sneak attack by Senator Sessions for the following reasons:
It would impose exorbitant costs on businesses at a time when our economy is most vulnerable:
An economic analysis commissioned by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce
concluded that the net societal costs of the program would be $10 billion a year
� a cost that would be felt disproportionately by small businesses. It would make Basic Pilot/E-Verify permanent without addressing its well documented database inaccuracies:
A 2007 independent evaluation of the program commissioned by DHS found that
the Basic Pilot/E-Verify database �is still not sufficiently up to date� to meet
the requirements for �accurate verification.�
SSA has estimated that if Basic Pilot/E-Verify were to become mandatory and
the databases were not improved, SSA database errors alone could result in 3.6
million workers a year being misidentified as not authorized for employment.
This would result in 6 out of every 100 workers having to visit an SSA office to
correct their records or lose their job.
It would force workers and businesses to pay a high price for Basic Pilot/E-Verify's inaccuracies:
Queries submitted to Basic Pilot/E-Verify by Intel Corporation in 2008 resulted
in nearly 13 percent of all workers being initially flagged as unauthorized for
employment. All of these workers were cleared by Basic Pilot/E-Verify as
work-authorized, but only after �significant investment of time and money�
and �lost productivity.�We urge all AILA members to call their Congressman today and oppose the Sessions amendment (SB 1371). Don't let Senator Session's stealth tactics create a nationwide crisis for employers!
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-5839069238864574507?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/07/there-he-goes-again-sessions-and-e.html)
2011 Lady Gaga | Before and After
manish756
04-12 03:23 PM
Gurus,
Today i received a mail(04/12/2009) .Uscis issued an RFE. I am still waiting for it in mail.
she is currently in india . coming back on 04/15/2009. will there be any problem for her while coming back. I am july 2007 filer on priority Date eb3 ( 04/23/2003). I have left my employer last year.My 140 was approved on feb 2007. what are my options.
Thanks,
Manish
Today i received a mail(04/12/2009) .Uscis issued an RFE. I am still waiting for it in mail.
she is currently in india . coming back on 04/15/2009. will there be any problem for her while coming back. I am july 2007 filer on priority Date eb3 ( 04/23/2003). I have left my employer last year.My 140 was approved on feb 2007. what are my options.
Thanks,
Manish
more...
Legal_In_A_Limbo
03-10 10:07 AM
we are going through it right now.
planning to file g-28 only and not AC-21 letter.
Will wait for a RFE to send a AC-21 letter.
Are you self filling G-28 or doing through another lawyer?
Thanks
planning to file g-28 only and not AC-21 letter.
Will wait for a RFE to send a AC-21 letter.
Are you self filling G-28 or doing through another lawyer?
Thanks
harrisonaquino
04-27 10:30 PM
Hi guys!
Probably this question has been answered somewhere else, but I just could it find it...
Basically, I need to know if it's required to actually send 3 years taxes or w/ Ws would be enough as initial evidence. The i-134 DO NOT ask for taxes, but for bank letters, employment letters and I think that for W2's.
Any past experiences would be much appreciated!
thanks
harrison
Probably this question has been answered somewhere else, but I just could it find it...
Basically, I need to know if it's required to actually send 3 years taxes or w/ Ws would be enough as initial evidence. The i-134 DO NOT ask for taxes, but for bank letters, employment letters and I think that for W2's.
Any past experiences would be much appreciated!
thanks
harrison
more...
user9
07-25 10:54 AM
Guys,
Are the dates mentioned in this bulletin for new I765 applications or renewal applications?
https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/Processtimes.jsp?SeviceCenter=NSC
Are the dates mentioned in this bulletin for new I765 applications or renewal applications?
https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/Processtimes.jsp?SeviceCenter=NSC
2010 lady gaga before she was
roseball
01-02 09:59 PM
H1 has been approved for 2009 quota for a client A. it is almost one and half year and the visa stamping has not been done. The client A is no more interested and a new Client B is interested to offer the same position in a different location or at H1 petitioning employers location. The LCA has been filed for the Client B and may get approved in next couple of days. Is that okay to use this new client letter while going for H1B Visa stamping? This new client is not the one on whom the actual H1B petition is approved.
Question is When going for H1 B visa is it necessary to use the client letter that has been used when applying for H1B approval. Can the clients be different while going for Visa Stamping?
This is urgent as the visa stamping appointment is in a few days. And the attorneys suggestion will be greatly appreciated.
Shouldn't be an issue. Make sure you carry documents showing evidence that you have been working for Client A and recently switched to Client B.
Question is When going for H1 B visa is it necessary to use the client letter that has been used when applying for H1B approval. Can the clients be different while going for Visa Stamping?
This is urgent as the visa stamping appointment is in a few days. And the attorneys suggestion will be greatly appreciated.
Shouldn't be an issue. Make sure you carry documents showing evidence that you have been working for Client A and recently switched to Client B.
more...
bpratap
02-19 04:41 PM
got to the SSN office with ur receipt, tell them you are waiting for ...... long for the card. you need the number to give to the employer. most of the officers would look in the system and would give you the number.
hair hot Lady Gaga Before She Was
GCBoy786
10-30 01:23 PM
Today, our AP status has changed to "Document mailed to applicant". Does this mean that they have mailed the approval document or is it an RFE document?
For most of the applicants the status has turned to "Approval Notice sent" but mine is different. Is anyone in the same boat.
For most of the applicants the status has turned to "Approval Notice sent" but mine is different. Is anyone in the same boat.
more...
canmt
11-14 07:43 AM
Guys,
My I-485 status changed to below. I did not receive any email from USCIS regarding the update. Is this normal?
Current Status: Card production ordered.
we ordered production of your new card. Please allow 30 days for your card to be mailed to you. If we need something from you we will contact you. If you move before you receive the card, call customer service. You can also receive automatic e-mail updates as we process your case. Just follow the link below to register.
I have not received the card as yet, any ideas as to how long it is going to take?
My I-485 status changed to below. I did not receive any email from USCIS regarding the update. Is this normal?
Current Status: Card production ordered.
we ordered production of your new card. Please allow 30 days for your card to be mailed to you. If we need something from you we will contact you. If you move before you receive the card, call customer service. You can also receive automatic e-mail updates as we process your case. Just follow the link below to register.
I have not received the card as yet, any ideas as to how long it is going to take?
hot Lady Gaga Before and After
siva143viji
03-24 10:10 PM
hi guys i need some help i send all my paper works lost friday. Is it true tht if tht paper work reaches them before 1st april they wont consider it. Do i have to send all the information again then. Please let me know it will be of great help
more...
house hair lady gaga before famous.
Ann Ruben
05-15 04:54 PM
Hi Sri,
Don't panic. This is NOT the end of your immigration journey. You are covered by AC-21, so if you find a job in a similar occupation with another employer, you can certainly take it. Your employer should seriously consider appealing the denial in order to preserve its reputation and to continue to employ H-1 workers.
If you have reason to believe that your employer might not be fully compliant with immigration laws, particularly as they relate to labor certifications and I-140's, you would be most protected if you changed employers
Ann
Don't panic. This is NOT the end of your immigration journey. You are covered by AC-21, so if you find a job in a similar occupation with another employer, you can certainly take it. Your employer should seriously consider appealing the denial in order to preserve its reputation and to continue to employ H-1 workers.
If you have reason to believe that your employer might not be fully compliant with immigration laws, particularly as they relate to labor certifications and I-140's, you would be most protected if you changed employers
Ann
tattoo images lady gaga before the
milind70
10-02 04:37 PM
Do you need to apply for SSN after getting GC? i was thinking that everyone who is working already has SSN... Do you have to get new one? that does not seem right??? please advise
Raj,
You dont get a new SSN. You just remove the restrictions that is on your previous card.When u become a LPR you should get a replacement card without any restrictions.If you read my post i mentioned SSN card replacement. I am sorry it might have mislead you otherwise.
Raj,
You dont get a new SSN. You just remove the restrictions that is on your previous card.When u become a LPR you should get a replacement card without any restrictions.If you read my post i mentioned SSN card replacement. I am sorry it might have mislead you otherwise.
more...
pictures Lady Gaga#39;s Image A Gimmick?
lskreddy
07-01 10:48 AM
Yes & Yes
dresses Check out Lady Gaga pre fame
catchagarwal
05-04 09:16 PM
I am on the same boat :(. Company A is sending me emails every week from past 1 month. Today he sent me a mail saying his legal attorney has started preparing a case against me. I want to be prepared for any legal action. What should i do? Please help
more...
makeup lady gaga, lady gaga candids,
awi_ok
02-18 04:22 PM
Good day everyone,
I am currently on H1B (company A) and am waiting for my new employer (company B) to do the transfer of my H1B. The stupid thing that I did was I gave my two weeks notice already (I have about 10 more business days left). My questions are:
1. How would the USCIS knows my last day of employment in company A? Do they know this only if employer A terminates my H1B?
2. What if I ask employer A not to terminate my H1B, at least until the actual filing (by company B) occurs?
Please advise, suggest and/or comment.
Thank you in advance,
T
I am currently on H1B (company A) and am waiting for my new employer (company B) to do the transfer of my H1B. The stupid thing that I did was I gave my two weeks notice already (I have about 10 more business days left). My questions are:
1. How would the USCIS knows my last day of employment in company A? Do they know this only if employer A terminates my H1B?
2. What if I ask employer A not to terminate my H1B, at least until the actual filing (by company B) occurs?
Please advise, suggest and/or comment.
Thank you in advance,
T
girlfriend hot lady gaga before famous.
omved
08-14 01:07 PM
Computer would not let officer open SR if your application is well within processing time. So I am not sure, how your SR was opened. Wait for your time to come and your GC would be approved.
hairstyles lady gaga before the fame
crazyghoda
01-14 05:16 PM
May I ask Why?
While driving back , at POE the process is simple. Always show your AP before passport and they will let you in. Never show the passport before the AP.
While driving back , at POE the process is simple. Always show your AP before passport and they will let you in. Never show the passport before the AP.
newuser
10-07 03:52 PM
Thanks for the info.
Any info if the last name is not the same of that my uncle's.
Any info if the last name is not the same of that my uncle's.
immilaw
09-18 04:15 PM
Dear Friends,
My PD (EB3)is Dec-02. I have gone for Finger Printing twice now.
I see lot of reference to '45 Day letter' in the forum . I have no recollection of receiving the '45 Day ' letter so far.
Am I missing something here?
Can any one of you please explain what this letter is about?
Thanks,
Sreekanth
When the state workforce agencies (DOL's) transfered their applications to the Backlog Reduction Centers (BEC), the BEC sent a 45 days letter to the petitioner and the attorney to confirm if they are still interested in proceeding with the pending labor (some were pending for 4-5 years and they do not want to work on it unless the petitioner is still interested). The BEC gives them 45 days to respond, hence the name.
My PD (EB3)is Dec-02. I have gone for Finger Printing twice now.
I see lot of reference to '45 Day letter' in the forum . I have no recollection of receiving the '45 Day ' letter so far.
Am I missing something here?
Can any one of you please explain what this letter is about?
Thanks,
Sreekanth
When the state workforce agencies (DOL's) transfered their applications to the Backlog Reduction Centers (BEC), the BEC sent a 45 days letter to the petitioner and the attorney to confirm if they are still interested in proceeding with the pending labor (some were pending for 4-5 years and they do not want to work on it unless the petitioner is still interested). The BEC gives them 45 days to respond, hence the name.
No comments:
Post a Comment