go_guy123
06-18 10:21 AM
If they'd only "fix" the Social Security Card to be more secure, I'm sure you'd reduce much of the illegal employment. the way the SS card is designed right now, anyone could print out as many of these on his home printer.
It was in 1986 amnesty bill where they added the employment verification requirement. However due to lobby pressure etc they kept the rule loose where employer is just supposed to ask and see but not required to do its investigation to find that they are genuine or fake. So it operated as a "Dont ask Dont tell" where they will simply accept the fake ssn , gc knowing fully well that they are fake.
In fact there have been cases where Tyson managers actually arranged middlemen to newly arrived illegals to provide them with the fake documents so that Tyson could hire them.
At the end of the day lots of labor intensive industries like agriculture is heavily dependent on illegal labor which is cheap. eliminating low cost illegals will make them nonviable.
After all Tom Tancredo also hired illegal to remodel his basement.
It was in 1986 amnesty bill where they added the employment verification requirement. However due to lobby pressure etc they kept the rule loose where employer is just supposed to ask and see but not required to do its investigation to find that they are genuine or fake. So it operated as a "Dont ask Dont tell" where they will simply accept the fake ssn , gc knowing fully well that they are fake.
In fact there have been cases where Tyson managers actually arranged middlemen to newly arrived illegals to provide them with the fake documents so that Tyson could hire them.
At the end of the day lots of labor intensive industries like agriculture is heavily dependent on illegal labor which is cheap. eliminating low cost illegals will make them nonviable.
After all Tom Tancredo also hired illegal to remodel his basement.
wallpaper Candy land party theme
kevnss
04-02 02:35 PM
Thanks for the useful information.
Recently I came back from India based AP but they stamped Mar 23 2009 on my I-94 as expired date since my AP will expire during that time. So would I need to file H1 extension to get new I-94.
Recently I came back from India based AP but they stamped Mar 23 2009 on my I-94 as expired date since my AP will expire during that time. So would I need to file H1 extension to get new I-94.
waiting4gc02
02-20 07:42 AM
Guys:
I wanted to know that if somebody has currently an approved LC and I-140(EB-3) with Company A and decided to change jobs to Company B, who would now file under EB-2.
a) Can he hold on to his EB3 priority date..though the new petition would be filed under EB-2 ?
Yes, I know a lot of ppl have asked this question in the wake of the retrogession that we are all sufferning through ?
b) If this Company B were to file for H1-B , as I understand it would count towards the 2007-2008 quota which opens on April 1st '07...does this scenario also force you to not start working till Oct'07 (which is when ppl who file in the 2007-08 quota are supposed to start working).
What I am trying to understand is that in this scenario can you change jobs and start to work for Company B without having to wait till Oct'07 ?
Thanks
I wanted to know that if somebody has currently an approved LC and I-140(EB-3) with Company A and decided to change jobs to Company B, who would now file under EB-2.
a) Can he hold on to his EB3 priority date..though the new petition would be filed under EB-2 ?
Yes, I know a lot of ppl have asked this question in the wake of the retrogession that we are all sufferning through ?
b) If this Company B were to file for H1-B , as I understand it would count towards the 2007-2008 quota which opens on April 1st '07...does this scenario also force you to not start working till Oct'07 (which is when ppl who file in the 2007-08 quota are supposed to start working).
What I am trying to understand is that in this scenario can you change jobs and start to work for Company B without having to wait till Oct'07 ?
Thanks
2011 Children Birthday Party Ideas
MatsP
February 2nd, 2006, 05:56 AM
We've been discussing this before... here (http://www.dphoto.us/forum/showthread.php?t=4551) for example.
Yes, Macro photography really needs small apertures..
--
Mats
Yes, Macro photography really needs small apertures..
--
Mats